Instantly identifies 20+ types of logical errors including Ad Hominem, Strawman, Circular Reasoning, and False Dichotomy using strict academic standards.
Evaluates the coherence of your argument. Detects weak thesis statements, disconnected transitions, and open loops that weaken persuasion.
Scans for hyperbole, passive voice abuse, emotional manipulation, and subjective bias. Helps ensure an objective, professional tone.
Provides counter-factual perspectives and evaluates the originality of your core arguments against common discourse.
Common rhetorical devices and errors detected by Aletheia.
Misrepresenting someone's argument to make it easier to attack. Instead of addressing the actual argument, a distorted version is refuted.
Attacking the person making the argument rather than the argument itself. Focusing on character or attributes instead of logic.
When the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The conclusion is essentially used as a premise.
Presenting only two options (either/or) when more possibilities exist. Also known as the Black-and-White fallacy.
Asserting that a relatively small first step will inevitably lead to a chain of related (negative) events without sufficient evidence.
Attempting to redirect the argument to another issue to which the person doing the redirecting can better respond.
Manipulating an emotional response (fear, pity, anger) in place of a valid or compelling argument.
Making a rushed conclusion without considering all of the variables. Basing a broad conclusion on a small sample.
Using a double meaning or ambiguity of language to mislead or misrepresent the truth.
相手の主張を歪めて引用し、その歪められた主張を論破することで、本来の主張を論破したように見せる手法。
主張の内容ではなく、主張している人物の人格や属性を攻撃することで反論とする誤謬。
結論が前提に含まれてしまっている論証。証明すべきことを根拠として使っている状態。
実際には他にも選択肢があるのに、二つの極端な選択肢しかないように装うこと。